Quote:
Originally Posted by gordonfan1989
Good article...and I dont have a prob with what he is saying. he isnt against the track in general...he is against adding an extra race to any track. And I agree...why not just get rid of ever double...except for daytona...talledega...lowes...and maybe some others thart are exciting and attract fans. Michiga dont need 2...Cali dont either (not sure if that has 2). How bout 4 road courses...that wold be exciting.
|
I present a better schedule
1)Daytona
2)Laguna Seca- not California
3)Las Vegas
4)Atlanta
5)Bristol
6)Martinsville
7)Texas
8)Phoenix
9)Talladega
10)Richmond
11)Kentucky-not darlington
12)Lowes
13)Dover
14)Pocono
15)Michigan
16)Infineion
17)New Hampshire
18)Daytona
19)Chicago
20)ORP- not Indy
21)Montreal-not pocano
22)Walkins Glen
23)Iowa-not michigan
24)Bristol
25)Darlington (Labor day)-not california
26)Richmond
chase
27)New Jersey Motorsports park(just opened)-not New Hampshire
28)Dover
29)Kansas
30)Talladega
31)Lowes
32)Martinsville
33)Nashville-not atlanta
34)North Wilkesboro-not texas
35)Rockingham-not phoenix
36)Homestead
Yes I have a dover bias i like dover and yeah i removed california from the schedule i can't stand that track i also added 2 road courses some nationwide tracks and old cup tracks